Hi-
I am considering redoing my old school HTML based website and replacing some of the pages with pages generated in ms publisher.
I made a pretty slick looking test home page but I noticed that much my old text will be converted to graphics by using word-art.
I have important key words strategically positioned in my web pages. I am worried that I will loose a lot Google value due to replacing text with graphics. Is it better to stick with an HTML based site that has been Google friendly or will using ms publisher be a detriment?
Thank you
I am considering redoing my old school HTML based website and replacing some of the pages with pages generated in ms publisher.
I made a pretty slick looking test home page but I noticed that much my old text will be converted to graphics by using word-art.
I have important key words strategically positioned in my web pages. I am worried that I will loose a lot Google value due to replacing text with graphics. Is it better to stick with an HTML based site that has been Google friendly or will using ms publisher be a detriment?
Thank you