Search results

Wouldn't mind a working version :) looks great

I looked at the source but couldn't see anything out of the ordinary, except the comment tags around the CSS which hasn't been necessary for a decade. Why do you use noscript tags?

The design is great, I really like the colors and layout, it looks very professional! Though the background color is a bit dark for my taste, I had to look very close to see that there was an image there. Maybe you could just lighten that up a bit to make the gradient/image more visible...

At least description and keywords. The description still shows up in Google searches so if you've got something to say about the page you should definitely try them out.

Nice, I see you've really mixed things up! I like the new simple navigation a lot better than the previous bubble incident. I can't say much other than I like it! But the home and portfolio link go the exact same place, is that intentional?

I liked it. The design was minimal but the message came through quite well, with the large headers and short sentences. Maybe you could spruce up the design a bit? I don't really think it needs much though, but something other than only text.

6 pages and 3 megs? Those are some large pages. A link to this would be good!

There's an effective little cheat for that sort of thing. Just scroll down to the example. javascript_show_hint.php. I couldn't believe it worked at first. ha :)

The second page was absolutely brilliant looking. All I can think of is that you hardly use any meta tags?

Hm, I didn't know that. Never been much of an IE fan :D

Yeah, me too. My viewing area is roughly 1200 pixels horizontally. Is the page centered correctly?

I can't really think of much to make this site any better, though I don't really feel inclined to click on the 'read' link. Maybe a little preview text would do the trick.

It's starting to look really good! Was the text background always white? It looks different, in a good way! All I can think of now is that the Huffsfitness text is a bit big, I kind of have to tilt my head back to read it. I've got a really small computer though :) no worries!

The slash simply signifies domain/ etc.. All I can see is that you forgot to close the tag. <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />

Hm, never seen <marquee> used on a website before! The desired effect shouldn't be too difficult to mimic, do you have a flash program?

Did anyone catch the anomalies in the articles section? The first articles' background color is white, the rest are dark Grey, and they have about 2000 pixels worth of padding at the bottom. Plus if you go to the discussion section the other links don't go anywhere? I'm using regular old FF3...

The fact that there are no hover effects whatsoever makes me feel like I'm browsing a concrete wall. It just feels flat you know? You could also add larger margins to the text compared to the header's 'cause it looks a bit cramped, you need some air! Besides that it looks pretty sweet! Keep...

Happy to help :) hope you figure it out. The blue was a lot easier on the eyes now!

It's very snazzy, but wouldn't it be better with a white background? When the primary colors of the rest of the layout aren't very lively, the dark background makes the page look kind of gloomy.

Illiterate huh :) okay, I do in fact have an example of a hover effect, http://www.htmlswag.com/articles/visual/css_tab_menu_1.html. But other than that, and a more pale shade of blue, you'll do fine :)