If there is one thing I know about logo design, its that it needs to look good not only in colour, but also black and white.
I'm going to go against the grain here and boldly say, that's not a logo. Its an illustration.
Here's some tips to simplify:
• You don't need the soil, everyone knows where a plant comes from, so its unnecessary.
• In logo design, avoid gradients as much as possible, in smaller applications, they will get lost and only change the hue to a lighter value/tone.
• I'm not sure if the dew drops are a necessity, but if they are, why are they realistic compared to the rest of the image?
• Imply, imply, imply! Nothing needs to be literal. Sometimes what isn't there gives the viewer the idea of what is causing it. Ex. white crescents instead of actual water drops.
• Personal opinion, do you need that much plant towering over the typography. Your type is applied so well here. It explains the delicateness of the imagery alone. Could the plant/leaf(s) just play a small role with the type or in the type? Think Starbucks. Big type, little mermaid/siren. Now its just the mermaid.siren because we know what its associated with. After time, it might just wind up being a pantone green circle.
Minimalist designs are the most effective designs because you know the only important information that is needed to get the idea across. At that point, it can be placed on virtually anything and you know what it is. Think the golden arches of McDonalds.
I look forward to what comes of this!