Search results

Wordpress would be my engine of choice to build that particular one. Language being Php/MySql. After checking out the source, it is indeed done with Wordpress 2.8.5 and looks to be a purchasable theme.

WordPress does everything any client I ever needed, and easy to use, extend, and secure. In the 2 cases Wordpress was not an option, I built my own custom CMS. A CMS that needs to handle much e-commerce should give Magento a serious consideration.

Sharepoint is a huge asp.net framework for putting together massive connected systems across multiple domains in business networks. Its very powerful and very much overkill, and very expensive (developer wise). I am a .NET architect and would agree with the choosing of asp.net, however I will...

It's a virus, lol. Seriously, its like any other tool, it's great when used for the appropriate reasons and when the person is actually capable of writing decent code. I prefer asp.net but I love WordPress and some of the other open-source solutions out there so PHP has a place in my heart...

A tool is a tool is a tool. Whatever you use that's most efficient for you is all you need. A web designer should never be judged on his choice of tools, rather the output of his efforts. Don't switch just for the sake of switching, switch if it makes sense to you to do so.

Expression Web is a Microsoft product and I can tell you are a Microsoft .NET architect and developer Expression Web is really only better than Dreamweaver in one area, ASP.NET development. And even then, I would choose to use Visual Studio without even thinking about it over Expression Web...

I shouldn't have said "why reinvent the wheel" without adding "each time" on the end. There are cases to develop a custom CMS for a project for sure!! I do it lots with asp.net projects. Also, ExpressionEngine is just plain kick-ass...good choice.

You weren't taught how to use one because hopefully you were taught the skills to build one. That being said, knowing the theory and concepts of programming (web languages) or other there is an important point made already by a few people: Why re-invent the wheel? There are many great systems...

1. Content has been edited 2. This is a pre-launch of our site to offer a promotion right now. The site will be completed, content changed, many pages added before the official launch. 3. Official site will not talk of price, I typically quote per project, and the content will be...

Not going to change my opinion of how he provides his feedback, but like I said I can take it. Sorry, JayT for calling you an asshole. How about throwing up your web design companies url for a good ol' fashioned review from the members, I won't review it, I won't be around likely, don't come...

Wow guy, I am a 30 year old .net architect with "money in the bank" trying to start a new venture of my own. Been a hard core programmer for a decade looking to do something new and interesting. I also am educated with a Computer Science degree, sorry for the "big words". Anyways, not sure...

It's not million dollar websites I work one, its .net applications. That's a fact and can provide you with references. I am an .net architect full-time and freelance on the side, trying to eventually move off on my own thing with this company. I am not broke, again .net architect full-time...

Definately unique and for that, thumbs up, good job!

check out my newly pre-launched company site @ http://www.ararepearl.com There are ZERO tables in that design, pure box model xhtml and css.

I would have charged $250 for it, not using a template, using an Ajax script instead of flash.

I am actually with 3D, I don't like it at all for anything. I understand why some people would, and not saying its bad, but my opinion is of pure dislike for Joomla.

yeah, I wrote my own .NET CMS system using the FCKEditor, love that control.

Any documentation that states you were allowed to use it on all your sites? If so, tell him to go pound sand. Otherwise, I have no idea, I never use flash.

Found an example by chance of a site that uses this design quite well. http://www.shopcomposition.com/ Most screens/functionality is on one page, but uses some custom Ajax libraries to load the detailed info.

Why is Google Chrome terrible? What do you find makes it terrible? I think its gonna be the next market leader. I like it, just needs some more work.