Web Design Forum  
 
Go Back   Web Design Forum > Web and Graphic Design > Web Design

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2011, 01:24 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7
Question table shown incorrect in Opera and Firefox

I'm webmaster of the site of my orchestra and i've got some trouble with tables on the site. The strangest part is that IE8, Google Chrome and Safari show everything correctly, Opera and Firefox mess up the some(!) tables and Firefox is misplacing some images (logo on 'nieuws2009'). This are the pages:
agenda
jubileum
agenda
nieuws2009


Please note that I'm from the Netherlands, so the site is in DUTCH.
Does anyone have an idea of what the problem might be?
Help is greatly appreciated!

EDIT:
All problems fixed, Thank you guys!

Last edited by pierb; 01-12-2011 at 06:19 AM. Reason: problems fixed
pierb is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-09-2011, 04:07 PM   #2
Gold Member
 
smoovo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 388
Default

It seems like your code have been written wrong. Your body tag should be placed before any iframe tag... You have placed it in middle of everything. Maybe that's your bug and maybe not, but you have to write it right first.

I moved your "plat" class from the last span before the logo and it moved it to its place... Try not to use the same class name to more than one element.
__________________
SMooVo - Web Design & Development
contact@smoovo.com
www.SMooVo.com
smoovo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2011, 02:41 AM   #3
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,053
Default

I agree with smoovo, fix the body tag issue first and foremost. Then go from there.
__________________
John Darling
Graphic / Web Designer
SmarterTools Inc.
(877) 357-6278
www.smartertools.com
PixelPusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2011, 04:26 PM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoovo View Post
It seems like your code have been written wrong. Your body tag should be placed before any iframe tag... You have placed it in middle of everything. Maybe that's your bug and maybe not, but you have to write it right first.

I moved your "plat" class from the last span before the logo and it moved it to its place... Try not to use the same class name to more than one element.
About the body-tag; I suppose you mean the one in the document setting up frames? Adobe Dreamweaver automatically sets up this structure of tags when using a frameset. When I put the body-tag before the frameset-tag, it gives an error. Besides, I'm using the same structure with another site, but that one doesn't show any trouble with misplaced images and listed tables, so that can't be the cause of this problem.

And the plat-class you're talking about, which one do you mean? I don't see any misplaced span-tags in "nieuws2009".
And how can it be explained that some browsers show the pages correctly and others mess it up?
pierb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2011, 09:14 PM   #5
Gold Member
 
smoovo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 388
Default

If you build a websites relying on a software don't expect to get a pro results, like you getting now. And i didn't mentioned any misplace span, i just said that after i took off the class="plat" from one of your spans the logo was in place, but it was just by playing, it doesn't say it will fix your problems.

I think you should learn more HTML and write the code by yourself, this way you will figure this kind of errors right away. Remember, the short way is the long one.

- Good Luck.
__________________
SMooVo - Web Design & Development
contact@smoovo.com
www.SMooVo.com
smoovo is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2011, 08:17 AM   #6
Bronze Member
 
springmedia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Falmouth, Cornwall
Posts: 60
Send a message via Skype™ to springmedia
Post

I aggree with Smoovo. Best of luck
__________________
Rich Lacey
Spring Media Design

Website Design Cornwall | Affrodable Website Design |Web Hosting Cornwall
springmedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 02:27 PM   #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoovo View Post
If you build a websites relying on a software don't expect to get a pro results, like you getting now.
Actually, most of the code IS written by hand, not using the design-mode of any program.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoovo View Post
I think you should learn more HTML and write the code by yourself, this way you will figure this kind of errors right away.
I mainly use Dreamweaver as FTP- and preview-software. I could have written the code in notepad too.

EDIT:
I removed most of the class-statements in the HTML-code and the logo on "nieuws2009" is fixed.
Can the problems with the tables be caused by classes too?

Last edited by pierb; 01-11-2011 at 02:46 PM. Reason: problem partially fixed
pierb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 02:46 PM   #8
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 509
Default

incidentally frames are a really bad choice for laying out a site
http://apptools.com/rants/framesevil.php
but guess it's a bit late for that
oh and your logo should be a gif or 8-bit png. (jpegs are for photos and images with complex gradients)

and if you don't me asking - what's the building on the page background and how is it linked to what you do? i'm just curious
d a v e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 02:49 PM   #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d a v e View Post
incidentally frames are a really bad choice for laying out a site
http://apptools.com/rants/framesevil.php
but guess it's a bit late for that
oh and your logo should be a gif or 8-bit png. (jpegs are for photos and images with complex gradients)

and if you don't me asking - what's the building on the page background and how is it linked to what you do? i'm just curious
It's indeed a bit late, but I'll keep it in mind for the next time. About the images, I normally do use png for normal pictures, but this is how I received the image and it used to work... Thanks anyway.
pierb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:52 PM   #10
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 509
Default

fair enough but a png
is 11kb compared to 66kb for a jpeg
d a v e is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
browsers, tables

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Camera Forum - Computer Forum - Web Design Forum

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.