Web Design Forum  
 
Go Back   Web Design Forum > Web and Graphic Design > Web Design

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2010, 05:30 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Default w3c standards

Most of the jobs in this field ask for the knowledge of W3C standards...

I am a web designer, i need to know what rules to follow for W3C standards when designing or coding a site, please any expert can help me out on this... i have some of my friends who are into web designing but they also are not aware of the W3C standards .


Thanks,
Silver
silver is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 02-10-2010, 05:54 PM   #2
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 29
Default

http://www.w3.org/standards/

Validate the html and css while you are building them

http://validator.w3.org/
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

and fix errors as you go.

Creating sites with valid code means they are more likely to display consistently across different browsers.

Also you should follow the accessibility guidelines

http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility

For certain types of site like medical, government etc, it can be against the law if they are not accessible to the blind etc.
__________________
North Park Design
Web Design & Development
www.northparkdesign.com
northpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 06:11 AM   #3
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silver View Post
... i have some of my friends who are into web designing but they also are not aware of the W3C standards .
Wow well you can one up them and teach them something now . FYI, websites that do not meet w3c standards are also going to have a tougher time ranking well in SEs. Northpark provided some great resources, I would bookmark some of them.

@northpark

I took a peak at your website...very clean design and nice choice of color. I like really like it, well done.
__________________
John Darling
Graphic / Web Designer
SmarterTools Inc.
(877) 357-6278
www.smartertools.com

Last edited by PixelPusher; 02-11-2010 at 06:14 AM.
PixelPusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 01:20 PM   #4
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PixelPusher View Post
FYI, websites that do not meet w3c standards are also going to have a tougher time ranking well in SEs.
Really pixel that is good to hear.

Silver W3C standards are set rules how you have code your html and css. Actually it is interesting to set to your site to comply standards.

It is not that tough but very interesting.

After completing your site you can use the validator to verify

here is another site

validator.ca
jonweb2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 07:46 PM   #5
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 99
Default

What about the validator in dreamweaver?
bluecollar01 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 02-11-2010, 07:46 PM   #6
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 99
Default

What about the validation tool in dreamweaver? Does it work to the extent it should?
bluecollar01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 12:03 AM   #7
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecollar01 View Post
What about the validation tool in dreamweaver? Does it work to the extent it should?
No, it does not, I wouldn't recommend relying too much on it. There's some things that the one in CS4 does not catch (don't know how earlier versions are). For example I found several errors in YouTube video codes that the W3C validator on the W3C site caught, but the one in DreamWeaver did not.

As far as errors affecting SEO, they can, but I'm pretty sure it depends upon the particular errors.
Does something like not fixing YouTube code (I usually do anyways but still, is it really necessary?), or using Paypal's invalid code (some Paypal code can cause quite a large amount of errors), really hurt SEO? I don't think it does, but maybe someone can clarify whether it does or not for sure.
I'm a big fan of running your website through W3C's validator, and really going through whatever errors that show up, but I'm skeptical of it always being necessary to fix ALL of them, there are a lot of aps that aren't valid, and I haven't heard of that necessarily harming a website's ranking, or even functionality (though many errors can do one or both of those things, and those ones really should be fixed).

Last edited by aracaris; 02-12-2010 at 12:07 AM.
aracaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 12:05 AM   #8
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 29
Default

W3c set the standards and the reason standards exist is so that websites function as intended and expected in the various web browsers available.

Dreamweaver uses w3c so I can't imagine there being any difference when it validates a site.

Firefox web developer addon has links in its toolbar for all available w3c validators as well as loads of other tools.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60

Valid code is not just "interesting" to a web designer, it's expected if you are being paid to code.

I've started using some css3 like textshadow properties which obviously don't validate at the moment but will eventually. I'll need to take a look at the new html5 even though I think xhtml is just fine

validator.ca uses w3c
__________________
North Park Design
Web Design & Development
www.northparkdesign.com
northpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 12:08 AM   #9
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 29
Default

i've not used dreamweaver in years so listen to aracaris

just use w3c
__________________
North Park Design
Web Design & Development
www.northparkdesign.com
northpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 12:16 AM   #10
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northpark View Post
W3c set the standards and the reason standards exist is so that websites function as intended and expected in the various web browsers available.

Dreamweaver uses w3c so I can't imagine there being any difference when it validates a site.

Firefox web developer addon has links in its toolbar for all available w3c validators as well as loads of other tools.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60

Valid code is not just "interesting" to a web designer, it's expected if you are being paid to code.

I've started using some css3 like textshadow properties which obviously don't validate at the moment but will eventually. I'll need to take a look at the new html5 even though I think xhtml is just fine

validator.ca uses w3c
I like to have my code be valid as much as possible, but sometimes I actually have clients that want me to use code for something or other that isn't valid. I really need to find some more aps (music players and the like) out there that use valid code so that I can show it to clients as a potential alternative. In many cases it's very easy to fix bad code for music/video, but some of the music aps out there I'm not sure quite how to get to validate without breaking yet.
There's still been times I've had to convince clients not to have me do table based layouts too, argg! And those can be really bad for SEO.

EDIT: one more note on validation, sometimes hosting services will add their own invalid code to your pages too, one that I'm using has started doing this, so watch out for that kind of thing happening. Think I'm going to call them and see if they'll remove it, if not maybe I'll be switching services. I've used hosting services before only to find they added a whole bunch of junk code to pages, and have dropped such services for that kind of thing in the past.

Last edited by aracaris; 02-12-2010 at 12:54 AM.
aracaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Camera Forum - Computer Forum - Web Design Forum

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.